Brunner v. Ohio Republican Party

555 U.S. 5, 129 S.Ct. 5 (2008)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Brunner v. Ohio Republican Party

United States Supreme Court
555 U.S. 5, 129 S.Ct. 5 (2008)

KS

Facts

The Help America Vote Act (HAVA) required that state officials cooperate in creating a database through which voter-registration information could be compared with the state’s motor vehicle authority to verify voter-registration application information. In Ohio, the HAVA was implemented by the secretary of state and head of the Bureau of Motor Vehicles (BMV) matching the information in the BMV database with information in the Statewide Voter Registration Database. The policy of the Ohio secretary of state was that when information could not be matched through the databases, relevant county boards of election would be notified and advised that the voter record must be updated. Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner (defendant) and her office stopped providing lists of voter-registration applications that failed to match county election board records. The Ohio Republican Party (ORP) (plaintiff) filed a lawsuit alleging that Brunner’s failure to provide the voter-registration information to county election officials violated the HAVA. The district court issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) against Brunner. Brunner appealed, requesting a stay of the TRO. A panel of judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit vacated the TRO. ORP requested the case be heard en banc. The Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reinstated the district court’s TRO. Brunner filed an application to stay the TRO with Justice Stevens.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership