Quimbee logo with url
From our private database of 14,500+ case briefs...

Bruns v. Mayhew

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
750 F.3d 61 (2014)


The federal Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (the Act) restricted the eligibility of non-U.S. citizens for Medicaid. In 1997, the State of Maine (defendant) passed a law extending state benefits to non-U.S. citizens ineligible for Medicaid under the Act. The Act granted states discretion to pass such laws. In 2011, however, Maine ended these state benefits. Aliens residing in Maine (plaintiffs) brought suit, alleging the termination of the state benefits violated their equal protection rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. The plaintiffs appealed.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Howard, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 270,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,500 briefs, keyed to 195 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.