Brunson Communications, Inc. v. Arbitron, Inc.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
266 F. Supp. 2d 377 (2003)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
Brunson Communications, Inc. (Brunson) (plaintiff) owned WGTW, a small, independently owned television station serving the Philadelphia area. Arbitron, Inc. (defendant) measured viewership across radio and television platforms, issuing reports relied upon by advertisers and others in making business decisions. Arbitron purported to measure the viewership of all television stations in the Philadelphia market area. However, Arbitron did not measure viewers watching WGTW. Brunson sued Arbitron for commercial disparagement, arguing that Arbitron’s publication of erroneous information to advertisers and others harmed Brunson’s commercial interests by implying that WGTW’s viewership was too small to warrant inclusion, dissuading advertising investment. Arbitron moved to dismiss, arguing that Brunson failed to allege facts supporting a commercial-disparagement claim. The federal trial court in which the case was pending considered the viability of Brunson’s claim.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Baylson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.