From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
Brunson v. Hemler
Louisiana Court of Appeal
989 So. 2d 246 (2008)
Facts
In 1936, Jules Gilley and his family began using an 80-acre tract of land for farming. Mr. Gilley’s daughters Barbara Cannon and Lydia Mae Brunson (plaintiffs) grew up in the family home nearby. The family had fenced in the entire property in 1938, with Mrs. Brunson’s husband, Robert Brunson (plaintiff), helping Mr. Gilley to construct the fence. Since that time, the land had been continually occupied, fenced, and farmed by Mr. Gilley and later by his family. A group of individuals, the trustee of a trust, the administrators of an educational fund, and officials of the University of Virginia were the record title owners (record title landowners) (defendants) of 60 acres of the 80-acre tract. Mr. and Mrs. Brunson and Mrs. Cannon filed a petition for declaratory judgment seeking to be declared the owners of the property by acquisitive prescription. At trial, one of the record title landowners admitted that he had not been on the land in question since 1965, claimed that he had not noticed any fencing or evidence of farming, and claimed that he had leased the right to hunt on the property a number of times. The trial court rendered the declaratory judgment for the Brunsons and Mrs. Cannon. The record title landowners appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Peatross, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 517,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
