From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.
United States Supreme Court
429 U.S. 477 (1977)
Brunswick Corporation (Brunswick) (defendant) was one of the largest manufacturers of bowling equipment in the United States. After a booming decade for the bowling industry in the 1950s, the bowling industry suffered a dramatic decline in the early 1960s. To counter a decrease in sales, Brunswick began purchasing and operating insolvent bowling centers that could be maintained while returning positive cash flow. By the 1970s, Brunswick owned and maintained over five times more bowling centers than the next-largest competitor. Among Brunswick’s bowling-center acquisitions were six bowling centers in markets that had competing bowling centers maintained by Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc. (Pueblo) (plaintiff). Pueblo brought an action against Brunswick, alleging that Brunswick’s acquisitions violated § 7 of the Clayton Act, which prohibits mergers that would either substantially lessen competition or tend to establish a monopoly. Pueblo also sought treble damages under § 4 of the Clayton Act. The district court awarded damages to Pueblo. The court of appeals affirmed, finding that a properly instructed jury could have deemed the acquisitions unlawful. Brunswick appealed the decision.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.