Brunswick Corp. v. Spinit Reel Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
832 F.2d 513 (1987)
- Written by Jenny Perry, JD
Facts
A division of Brunswick Corporation (plaintiff) manufactured and sold fishing reels. Spinit Reel Company (Spinit) (defendant) also manufactured and sold fishing reels and was founded by a former Brunswick employee. Brunswick and Spinit sold reels in the same marketing channels and were direct competitors. The district court found that Spinit had copied one of Brunswick’s spin-cast reels in violation of § 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125. The court also determined that there was actual confusion among consumers and retailers. Brunswick submitted evidence that its sales of spin-cast reels had declined and that its sales of the reel that Spinit copied had declined by an even wider margin. In response, Spinit introduced evidence suggesting that the introduction of new reels to the market by other competitors might have contributed to Brunswick’s weak sales. Brunswick argued that it lost one sale of its reel as a result of each unit Spinit sold of the infringing reel. The district court issued an injunction but declined to award monetary damages, and Brunswick appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McKay, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.