Bryan v. MacPherson
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
608 F.3d 614 (2010)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
Carl Bryan (plaintiff) was pulled over by Officer Brian MacPherson (defendant) in a routine traffic stop for a seat-belt violation. During the initial interaction, Bryan became extremely agitated with himself for failing to put on his seat belt. As a result, Officer MacPherson directed Bryan to pull his car over to the curb, and Bryan complied. Bryan continued to display strange and agitated behavior by shouting expletives at himself and hitting his steering wheel before exiting his vehicle, despite not being told to do so. Bryan was wearing only boxer shorts and tennis shoes when he exited and began hitting his thighs and yelling gibberish from a distance of 15 to 25 feet from Officer MacPherson. Without warning, Officer MacPherson then shot Bryan from behind with a taser gun, causing Bryan to fall and sustain injuries to his face and teeth. Bryan brought suit, claiming that Officer MacPherson’s use of nonlethal but excessive force violated his Fourth Amendment rights. Officer MacPherson moved for summary judgment based on qualified immunity. The district court denied the motion on multiple grounds and found that a reasonable jury could find that Officer MacPherson used excessive force. Officer MacPherson appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wardlaw, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.