Bryant v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
66 T.C.M. 1594, T.C. Memo 1993-597 (1993)

- Written by Joe Cox, JD
Facts
Ellen Bryant (plaintiff) was a third-grade teacher at Tower Hill School. During the 1989 to 1990 school year, Tower Hill switched from written report cards to computerized reports for students. Starting in January 1991, elementary teachers had to prepare these reports on Macintosh-compatible technology. From January to August 1990, the school had eight Macintosh computers available for faculty and student use. From September to December 1990, the number had increased to 15 computers. In February 1990, Bryant purchased a $3,233 Macintosh computer so that she could prepare the reports at home. Bryant attempted to deduct depreciation on the computer on her income tax returns. However, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the commissioner) (defendant) disallowed that deduction because the computer was not obtained for the convenience of Tower Hill School and as a condition of Bryant’s employment. Bryant argued that because of the few available computers and the poor condition of the neighboring area and school security, Bryant would have been unable to timely prepare the required reports without her own computer. Evidence indicated that some other teachers did complete the reports on the school computers. Regardless, Bryant filed suit regarding the claimed deductions.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gussis, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.