This website requires JavaScript. Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings, or use a different web browser like Google Chrome or Safari.

Options

From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...

Buckley v. Haddock

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

292 Fed. Appx. 791 (2008)

Facts

Jesse Buckley (plaintiff) was arrested by Deputy Jonathan Rackard (defendant) as a result of a traffic stop during which Buckley refused to sign the citation. Rackard arrested Buckley by putting handcuffs on Buckley and then directing Buckley to exit his vehicle and get into the police car. Buckley started to comply but then purposely fell to the ground near the police car and refused to get up. Rackard ordered Buckley to get up and get into the police car multiple times, then told Buckley that Rackard would use a Taser gun if Buckley continued to stay on the ground. Buckley did not get up, and Rackard fired the Taser gun. Rackard ensured that the electrodes of the gun maintained contact with Buckley even as he moved around in pain. Within a very short period of time, Rackard repeated this two more times. After the third shock from the Taser gun, Rackard called for backup. When backup arrived, Rackard and the other police officer physically moved Buckley into the police car. Buckley had 16 small burns and scarring on his skin. Buckley sued and alleged the use of excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Buckley alleged that the repeated use of a Taser on a nonviolent and detained arrestee was excessive and unconstitutional. The trial court denied Rackard’s motion for qualified immunity, and Rackard appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Edmondson, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
The procedural disposition (e.g., reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Martin, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 603,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.
Unlock this case brief Read our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.
Learn about our approach Read more about Quimbee

Here's why 603,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Here's why 603,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
33,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
Uniform format for every case brief
Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
Top-notch customer support