Buending v. Town of Redington Beach
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
10 F.4th 1125 (2021)
- Written by Solveig Singleton, JD
Facts
Florida state courts traditionally recognized that the public had a right to make customary uses of private owners’ land. In June 2018, the Town of Redington Beach (town) (defendant) passed an ordinance recognizing and protecting the public’s customary use of the dry sand areas of local beaches (beach ordinance). In July 2018, the State of Florida passed legislation requiring municipalities and other governmental entities to seek judicial declarations to affirm customary public use of a beach (beach law). However, the beach law did not apply to rules enacted before 2016, and governmental entities could use ordinances protecting customary uses as affirmative defenses if the ordinances were passed before July 1, 2018 (affirmative-defense provision). Shawn Buending and other Redington Beach property owners (owners) (plaintiffs) sued the town, arguing that the beach ordinance violated the beach law and constituted a taking under the United States Constitution and the Florida State Constitution. The owners argued that the affirmative-defense provision applied only in defense of takings suits. The town offered the testimony of residents and photographs as evidence that the public had customarily used the dry sand area of the owners’ beaches. The trial court granted the owners’ motion for summary judgment on the grounds that the beach ordinance violated the state beach law and that the town’s evidence of customary use was insufficient. The town appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Martin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.