Buffalo Forge Co. v. United Steelworkers of America

428 U.S. 397 (1976)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Buffalo Forge Co. v. United Steelworkers of America

United States Supreme Court
428 U.S. 397 (1976)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

The Buffalo Forge Co. (plaintiff) had collective-bargaining agreements with two local unions of the United Steelworkers of America (the unions) (defendants). The unions represented production and maintenance workers at three Buffalo Forge plants. The collective-bargaining agreements contained no-strike clauses and grievance and arbitration provisions for settling disputes over contract interpretation. Separately, office workers at the three Buffalo Forge plants had been negotiating for months on collective-bargaining terms. The office workers went on strike, and consequently, in solidarity, the unions’ production and maintenance workers honored the office workers’ picket line and refused to work as well. Buffalo Forge filed a complaint in district court alleging that the unions had violated the no-strike clauses and prayed for injunctive relief. Arbitration on the contract dispute had not yet commenced. The district court found that the unions’ workers had gone on strike in “sympathy” rather than over their own grievance and the court was not authorized to issue an injunction under the Norris-LaGuardia Act. The court of appeals affirmed, and the Supreme Court agreed to review the matter.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 825,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership