Bulley & Andrews, Inc. v. Symons Corp.
Illinois Appellate Court
323 N.E.2d 806 (1975)
- Written by Jayme Weber, JD
Facts
Bulley & Andrews, Inc. (Bulley) (plaintiff) was a general contractor that entered a contract with Symons Corporation (Symons) (defendant) to build an addition to the Symons premises. Symons designed and manufactured concrete-forming equipment, which shapes wet concrete. The contract stated that Symons would supply Bulley with certain equipment from the Symons catalog for Bulley’s concrete work on the project, including tie rods and rustication strips. The copy of the Symons catalog attached to the contract featured both looped tie rods and threaded tie rods. Bulley typically used looped tie rods, but Symons supplied Bulley with threaded tie rods for this project. The Symons catalog did not even include the rustication strips Symons provided to Bulley. Bulley used the materials and never said anything to Symons about either the tie rods or the rustication strips while working on the project. After completing the project, however, Bulley submitted a claim to Symons to recover the additional expense caused by the tie rods and rustication strips Symons had given Bulley. Symons refused to pay, and Bulley sued. The trial court ruled for Symons. Bulley appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McGloon, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.