Bullock Electric Manufacturing Co. v. Crocker-Wheeler Co.

141 F. 101 (1905)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Bullock Electric Manufacturing Co. v. Crocker-Wheeler Co.

United States Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
141 F. 101 (1905)

Facts

On November 27, 1891, Harry Leonard (plaintiff) applied for a patent on a multiple-voltage electrical system. The patent was issued on July 5, 1892. Leonard and his purported licensee, Bullock Electric Manufacturing Company (plaintiff), brought suit to enjoin alleged infringement of the patent by Crocker-Wheeler Co. (defendant). As a defense, Crocker-Wheeler asserted that the Leonard patent was anticipated by a patent with an application date of November 11, 1891, issued to Smith on March 15, 1892. Leonard introduced written evidence in the form of a description of Leonard’s invention that bore the signature of his patent attorney, H. W. Seeley, with a date of October 3, 1891. Though Seeley was deceased, two witnesses attested to the authenticity of the signature. There was evidence that the delay in filing Leonard’s application was due to Seeley’s ill health.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lanning, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership