Buntrock v. Buntrock

419 So. 2d 402 (1982)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
B
From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Buntrock v. Buntrock

Florida District Court of Appeals
419 So. 2d 402 (1982)

Facts

Dean L. Buntrock (plaintiff) moved to have three Illinois attorneys admitted to practice in a Florida trial court to represent Dean in his divorce suit against Elizabeth A. Buntrock (defendant). Elizabeth objected to the motion, stating that at least one of the attorneys, Peer Pedersen, had previously represented her. Further, Elizabeth testified that Pedersen had been her father’s attorney, had known Elizabeth since she was young, and was familiar with all her financial secrets. Elizabeth also presented evidence that Pedersen had a financial stake in marital property at stake in the lawsuit. The trial court denied the motion, and Dean applied to the Florida District Court of Appeals, arguing that Pedersen should be allowed to represent him because Elizabeth was not able to show that she made confidential communications to Pederson.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Dell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 791,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Legal Ethics

Key Terms