From our private database of 30,900+ case briefs...
Burbank Grease Services, LLC v. Sokolowski
Wisconsin Supreme Court
717 N.W.2d 781 (2006)
Burbank Grease Services, LLC (Burbank) (plaintiff) collected and processed used restaurant fryer grease, grease from grease traps, and industrial grease. Larry Sokolowski (defendant) worked for Burbank from 1997 until April of 2001, when he resigned to begin a new position as a sales and customer-service representative for United Liquid Waste Recycling, Inc. (United Liquid) (defendant). Prior to resigning, Sokolowski obtained confidential customer lists, collection and revenue data, and pricing information from Burbank’s computers without Burbank’s permission and took that information with him to United Liquid. Sokolowski and United Liquid subsequently formed United Grease, LLC (United Grease) (defendant), which competed directly with Burbank in collecting restaurant grease, trap grease, and industrial grease. Sokolowski used Burbank’s confidential information to solicit customers for United Grease and acquired close to 80 of Burbank’s restaurant customers, 157 of Burbank’s grease-trap customers, and one or two of Burbank’s industrial customers. Burbank subsequently sued Sokolowski, United Liquid, and United Grease in Wisconsin state court, alleging misappropriation of trade secrets in violation of the state’s trade-secret statute—Wis. Stat. § 134.90—and various common-law tort claims. The trial court granted summary judgment for Sokolowski, United Liquid, and United Grease and dismissed the complaint after finding that Burbank’s information was not protectable under § 134.90 because it did not meet the statutory definition of a trade secret. The trial court also concluded that § 134.90(6), the statute’s preemption provision, precluded common-law tort claims that were based on the misappropriation of confidential information unless those claims involved information that met the statutory definition of a trade secret. Burbank appealed, and the state appellate court affirmed. The Wisconsin Supreme Court granted review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Roggensack, J.)
Dissent (Bradley, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 551,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.