Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Burger v. Kemp

483 U.S. 776 (1987)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...

Burger v. Kemp

United States Supreme Court

483 U.S. 776 (1987)

Facts

Burger (defendant) and Stevens were charged with murder and tried separately. Leaphart was appointed to represent Burger and Leaphart’s law partner was appointed to represent Stevens. Both Burger and Stevens confessed, but at trial stated that the other was more culpable in the killing. Burger was the one who actually killed the victim. Both Burger and Stevens were convicted and both appealed. Leaphart had helped his partner in defending Stevens throughout and drafted the appellate briefs for both Burger and Stevens. Although Leaphart had argued for Burger at trial that Stevens was more culpable, he omitted that argument in Burger’s appellate brief. Burger was convicted and filed a federal petition for habeas relief, arguing that Leaphart’s failure to raise the culpability issue in the appellate brief rendered his assistance ineffective in violation of Burger’s constitutional right to counsel. The district court rejected Burger’s claim and the court of appeals affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)

Dissent (Blackmun, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 616,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 616,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 616,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 35,400 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership