Supreme Court of California
913 P.2d 473 (Cal. 1996)
Wendy Burgess (plaintiff) filed a petition for divorce from Paul Burgess (defendant). The trial court entered an order dissolving the marriage and awarding joint legal custody of their two children to Wendy and Paul, sole physical custody to Wendy, and liberal visitation rights to Paul, pursuant to an agreed-upon visitation schedule. At a hearing, Wendy testified that she had accepted a job transfer in a city 40 miles away and intended to move there with the children. Wendy stated that the job was career advancing and would permit the children to have greater access to medical care, extracurricular activities, and good private schools. Paul objected to the relocation and testified that he would not be able to maintain his current visitation schedule with the children if they moved, although he stated that the trip to the new city was an easy commute. The trial court upheld its previous custody-and-visitation order but provided that, upon Wendy’s relocation, Paul would have visitation with the children on alternate weekends, with at least one midweek visitation. Paul filed a motion for reconsideration and a motion for a change in custody. The trial court denied Paul’s reconsideration motion. After a hearing on the motion for a change in custody, the trial court held that Paul had failed to present evidence of a substantial change in circumstances warranting a change in custody. Paul appealed the denial of both motions. The court of appeals reversed and held that Wendy’s relocation was unnecessary. The Supreme Court of California granted certiorari to review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Mosk, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 219,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.