Burgess v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
2 Cal. 4th 1064, 831 P.2d 1197, 9 Cal. Rptr. 2d 615 (1992)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
After Burgess (plaintiff) gave birth to her son, Joseph, by cesarean section, she was informed that the baby suffered permanent brain and nervous system damage due to oxygen deprivation. Shortly thereafter Burgess was given additional sedatives. Burgess first felt emotional distress about Joseph’s condition several hours later when she awoke from the sedatives. Subsequently, Burgess filed suit for negligently inflicted emotional distress against Gupta (defendant), the obstetrician who delivered the child. Gupta moved for summary judgment, arguing that Burgess did not meet the requirements for recovery of damages for emotional harm. The trial court granted Gupta’s motion and Burgess appealed. The intermediate appellate court reversed and held that Burgess was a “direct victim” of Gupta’s negligence and not merely a “bystander.” Gupta appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Panelli, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
