Burke v. City of Charleston
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
139 F.3d 401 (1998)

- Written by Catherine Cotovsky, JD
Facts
Robert Burke (plaintiff) sued the City of Charleston (City) to challenge a historic-preservation ordinance invoked by the City to deny a permit to display a mural painted by Burke in the Old and Historic District of Charleston. Burke was commissioned by restaurant-owner Ron Klenk to paint a mural depicting a colorful world of fantasy creatures on an outside wall of Klenk’s building. Burke initiated work on the mural before Klenk applied for a permit from the Board of Architectural Review (BAR), which was charged with reviewing all exterior changes within the historic district. The BAR issued a stop-work order to Burke, and Klenk applied for a permit that was subsequently denied by the BAR, who claimed that the mural was garish and inappropriate for display in the historic district. Burke filed suit in district court, claiming violation of his First Amendment right to free speech and Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection. The district court found that Burke had standing, but the court entered judgment for the City. Burke appealed the judgment with respect to his First Amendment claims.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Davis, J.)
Dissent (Wilkinson, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.