Burke v. Spartanics, Ltd.

252 F.3d 131 (2001)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Burke v. Spartanics, Ltd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
252 F.3d 131 (2001)

Play video

Facts

Alphonso Burke (plaintiff) was using a machine made by Spartanics, Ltd. (defendant) while working for Metal Etching Company (defendant). Metal Etching had modified the Spartanics machine. The effect of the modification led to employees regularly—and unsafely—placing their hands on a cutting surface. Burke had been using the machine in that unsafe manner for eight months. While working with his supervisor, Burke placed his hand on the cutting surface. The supervisor, unaware of the location of Burke’s hand, activated the machine. The machine severed several of Burke’s fingers. On the front of the machine, there was a warning about touching the cutting surface, but on the back of the machine, where Burke was located, there was no warning. Burke sued Spartanics, alleging a breach of the duty to warn. Spartanics impleaded Metal Etching as a third-party defendant. The jury instructions, over Burke’s objection, stated that there was no duty to warn if Burke knew of the danger or if the danger were generally known. The jury returned a verdict against Burke. Burke appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Calabresi, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership