Burke v. Spartanics, Ltd.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
252 F.3d 131 (2001)
- Written by Brian Meadors, JD
Facts
Alphonso Burke (plaintiff) was using a machine made by Spartanics, Ltd. (defendant) while working for Metal Etching Company (defendant). Metal Etching had modified the Spartanics machine. The effect of the modification led to employees regularly—and unsafely—placing their hands on a cutting surface. Burke had been using the machine in that unsafe manner for eight months. While working with his supervisor, Burke placed his hand on the cutting surface. The supervisor, unaware of the location of Burke’s hand, activated the machine. The machine severed several of Burke’s fingers. On the front of the machine, there was a warning about touching the cutting surface, but on the back of the machine, where Burke was located, there was no warning. Burke sued Spartanics, alleging a breach of the duty to warn. Spartanics impleaded Metal Etching as a third-party defendant. The jury instructions, over Burke’s objection, stated that there was no duty to warn if Burke knew of the danger or if the danger were generally known. The jury returned a verdict against Burke. Burke appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Calabresi, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
