Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White
United States Supreme Court
548 U.S. 53 (2006)
Sheila White (plaintiff) was the only female employee in the Maintenance of Way department of Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company (Burlington) (defendant). As a track laborer, White was assigned to operate the forklift, which was one of the easier and more coveted duties of that position. In September 1997, White complained to Burlington that her immediate supervisor, Bill Joiner, had told her that women should not work in the Maintenance of Way department and had made inappropriate comments in the presence of her male colleagues. Burlington conducted an internal investigation and ultimately suspended Joiner for 10 days. White was subsequently advised that she would no longer operate the forklift, due to complaints by White’s coworkers that a more senior man should operate the forklift. In December 1997, after a disagreement with another supervisor, White was suspended indefinitely without pay for insubordination. Pursuant to internal grievance procedures, Burlington found that White had not been insubordinate. Burlington reinstated White and awarded White back pay for her suspension. White filed complaints with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, alleging that White’s reassignment and suspension constituted retaliation by Burlington for her complaint against Joiner. White later sued Burlington in district court, alleging retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The jury found that White had suffered a materially adverse change in the terms and conditions of her employment, and awarded White compensatory damages. The court of appeals affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Breyer, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 726,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 726,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.