Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.
United States Supreme Court
282 U.S. 359 (1931)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
From 1913 to 1916, Sanford & Brooks Company (S&B) (plaintiff) performed contractual work for the United States government (government). The government failed to adequately compensate S&B for the contract expenses. Consequently, S&B’s federal tax returns showed net losses for 1913, 1915, and 1916. S&B sued the government to recover its losses on the contract and was finally reimbursed in 1920 for those losses. S&B did not report the reimbursement as part of its gross income for 1920, reasoning that federal tax law imposed income taxes only on the net profits of a transaction. The reimbursement compensated S&B for its losses on the contract, but left S&B with no net profit. The commissioner of internal revenue (commissioner) (defendant) determined that S&B should have included the reimbursement in its gross income for 1920, and assessed back taxes. S&B petitioned the Board of Tax Appeals for review, which ruled for the commissioner. S&B appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed, holding that the reimbursement was not income to S&B, but rather a return of S&B’s losses on the contract. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stone, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
