Burnett v. National Enquirer, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
144 Cal. App. 3d 991 (1983)
- Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD
Facts
The National Enquirer (defendant) published a four-sentence article in its gossip column that claimed that Carol Burnett (plaintiff) got into a loud argument with Henry Kissinger and acted erratically at a restaurant. Burnett’s attorney requested in writing that the National Enquirer print a correction or retraction, which the National Enquirer did print. Burnett nonetheless filed suit for libel. The jury awarded Burnett $300,000 in compensatory damages and $1.3 million in punitive damages. The trial court reduced the damages award to $50,000 in compensatory and $750,000 in punitive damages. The National Enquirer appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Roth, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.