Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

Burns Philp Food, Inc. v. Cavalea Cont'l Freight, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
135 F.3d 526 (1998)


Facts

Burns Philp Food, Inc. (Burns) (plaintiff) and Cavalea Cont’l Freight, Inc. (Cavalea) (defendant) purchased adjacent portions of industrial real estate in Chicago. Because of an error in the property records, Burns mistakenly paid property taxes on land owned by Cavalea over a number of years. When Burns informed Cavalea of the mistake, Cavalea refused to reimburse Burns. Burns then sued Cavalea in a federal district court for restitution. Cavalea filed a counterclaim, alleging that Burns had erected a fence that trespassed on Cavalea’s property. Receipt of the counterclaim was the first time Burns received notice of the alleged trespass. Burns had erected the fence along what it believed to be the property line, based on a survey of the land. The surveying job was poorly done, however. Thus, the fence effectively gave Burns 2,000 square feet of Cavalea’s land. Cavalea had been aware of the trespass for some period of time before filing the counterclaim. The fence was dismantled the following year. After a nonjury trial, the court ruled that Burns was entitled to recover five years of taxes paid on Cavalea’s land and that Cavalea was not entitled to damages for Burns’s trespass because Cavalea had failed to provide notice thereof. The district judge acknowledged that requiring notice was not necessarily consistent with the traditional law of trespass but that it was proper in the instant case as a matter of “elemental justice.” Both parties appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Easterbrook, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.