From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
Burns v. Reed
United States Supreme Court
500 U.S. 478 (1991)
- Written by Whitney Kamerzel , JD
Facts
Richard Reed (defendant), a state prosecutor, participated in a probable-cause hearing to examine a witness and successfully helped the police acquire a search warrant. Reed also provided legal advice to the police by advising the police that probable cause existed to arrest Cathy Burns (plaintiff). Based on these actions of Reed, Burns sued Reed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for damages. The federal district court granted a directed verdict for Reed, holding that prosecutors are entitled to absolute immunity from civil suits arising out of their official duties. The court of appeals affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
