Burns v. Thiokol Chemical Corporation
United States Court of Appeals for Fifth Circuit
483 F.2d 300 (1973)
- Written by Denise McGimsey, JD
Facts
Claxton Burns (plaintiff) was terminated from his employment with Thiokol Chemical Corporation (Thiokol) (defendant) after working there for 14 years. Alleging racial discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, Burns sued Thiokol in a federal district court. Burns propounded interrogatories to Thiokol in which he requested, inter alia, (1) the names, ages, genders, educational histories, and employment histories of all white employees at Thiokol’s plant since 1960; (2) a list of all permanent and temporary employment vacancies at the plant since 1960 and 1964, respectively, and background information about the applicants and hirees for such positions; and (3) job descriptions of non–bargaining unit jobs at the plant. Thiokol objected to the interrogatories, contending that they requested irrelevant material and were unduly burdensome to respond to. The district court sustained Thiokol’s objection. The court later decided the matter in favor of Thiokol, holding that Burns was not terminated on account of race. Burns appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brown, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
