Burtoff v. Burtoff

418A.2d 1085 (1980)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Burtoff v. Burtoff

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
418A.2d 1085 (1980)

  • Written by Whitney Kamerzel , JD

Facts

Samuel Burtoff (defendant) and Wilma Burtoff (plaintiff) were married for less than a year. Both had been previously married. Samuel had assets worth over one million dollars, and he had children from a previous marriage. Wilma was a nurse with an annual salary of approximately $8,000. To prevent a property battle that replicated his first divorce, Samuel asked Wilma to sign a premarital agreement. The agreement ensured Samuel’s separate property would pass to his children. In addition, the agreement waived Wilma’s right to alimony or support upon a future divorce in exchange for a lump-sum payment calculated based on the number of years the Burtoffs were married. Ten thousand dollars was to be paid if the Burtoffs were married for less than one year. The sums roughly matched Wilma’s annual salary in case she decided to stop working. Attached to the agreement was a document identifying the Burtoffs’ respective assets and salaries. After speaking with a lawyer, Wilma signed the agreement. Eight days before their first anniversary, Samuel sent Wilma a letter that they were separating, and her personal items were moved to an apartment Samuel had rented for her. Wilma filed suit for pendente lite for temporary financial spousal support while the Burtoffs’ divorce was pending. The trial court upheld the agreement, but it stated that Wilma might be entitled to additional pendente lite support to prevent her from becoming a public charge.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gallagher, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 748,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 748,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 748,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership