Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
United States Supreme Court
134 S. Ct. 2751, 573 U.S. 682 (2014)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (act) prevented the federal government from acting in any way that burdened a person’s free exercise of religion unless the action was the least-restrictive means of serving a compelling government interest. The United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) (defendant) passed regulations that required closely held corporations, including Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (Hobby Lobby) and two others (plaintiffs), to provide health-insurance coverage for certain methods of contraception. The methods of contraception violated the sincerely held religious beliefs of Hobby Lobby’s owners. Other HHS regulations provided cost-free access to contraception for employees of religious nonprofit corporations. As a result, Hobby Lobby brought suit, claiming that the HHS regulations violated the act. The district court denied Hobby Lobby’s motion for a preliminary injunction, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit reversed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Alito, J.)
Concurrence (Kennedy, J.)
Dissent (Ginsburg, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
