Bush v. ProTravel International, Inc.
New York City Civil Court
746 N.Y.S.2d 790 (2002)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
In May 2001, Alexandra Bush (plaintiff), a resident of Staten Island, New York, booked a safari vacation with Micato Safaris (defendant) and ProTravel International, Inc. (ProTravel) (defendant), a retail travel agent in downtown Manhattan. The travel agreement required Bush to give ProTravel an initial 20 percent deposit in the amount of $1,516, which she forfeited if she did not provide notice of her intent to cancel the safari by September 14, 2001, 60 days before the scheduled start of the trip. Then the attacks of September 11, 2001, occurred. The City of New York was in chaos for days after the attack. Travel was restricted to and from Manhattan, and telephone service had been interrupted. Bush made numerous unsuccessful attempts to telephone defendants to cancel the safari prior to the September 14, 2001, deadline. Bush finally reached ProTravel to cancel the vacation in mid-October. After defendants refused to return Bush’s deposit, she filed suit to recover the money. Thereafter, Micato and ProTravel filed separate motions for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Vitaliano, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
