United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
118 F.3d 519 (1997)
Jerri Bush (plaintiff) worked at Rumpke Recycling, Inc. (Rumpke), a recycling plant for aluminum cans. SECO Electric Company (SECO) (defendant) installed the wiring for a can conveyor that moved cans within a pit into a hopper. If the conveyor left some cans behind, an employee would descend into the pit, gather the cans, and haul them out of the pit. Cans were not supposed to be fed into the conveyor manually from within the pit, and the safety protocol was to shut off the conveyor from outside the pit prior to entering it. There was no emergency shut-off button in the pit where employees would be cleaning up extraneous cans. A month after SECO installed the conveyor, Bush performed pit duty for the first time. Unaware of the safety protocol, she left the conveyor running and shoveled the loose cans directly onto the conveyor. The conveyor caught Bush’s clothes, and she lost her arm. Bush sued SECO for negligently failing to wire an emergency shut-off switch inside the pit. SECO moved for summary judgment, arguing that under Indiana law, the acceptance rule barred liability between SECO and Bush. The acceptance rule provided that a contractor’s duty of care extended only to the party with whom it held a contract, or had privity. After an owner accepts a contractor’s work, the owner becomes exclusively liable for injury arising from the work. SECO argued that once Rumpke accepted SECO’s installation of the conveyor’s wiring, Rumpke became solely liable for injuries caused by the conveyor’s defects, because SECO lacked privity with the conveyor’s users. The district court agreed that SECO did not owe Bush a duty of care and granted SECO’s motion for summary judgment. Bush appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Cudahy, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 219,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.