Bushel v. Miller
Court of King’s Bench
93 Eng. Rep. 428 (1718)
Porters used a hut to store goods at a wharf until the ship to which they were delivering the goods arrived. The plaintiff and the defendant were both porters and each had a right to use the hut. The plaintiff put goods that belonged to the owner of the goods in the hut such that the defendant could not get to his space in the hut without moving the plaintiff’s goods. When the defendant arrived at the hut, he moved the goods to get to his space, but failed to return them. The goods were then lost. The plaintiff ended up paying the owner for the value of the goods and then brought suit against the defendant for conversion.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 159,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,700 briefs, keyed to 186 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.