Business Roundtable v. Securities and Exchange Commission

905 F.2d 406 (1990)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Business Roundtable v. Securities and Exchange Commission

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
905 F.2d 406 (1990)

  • Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD

Facts

The New York Stock Exchange (exchange) had a long-standing rule that required listed companies to provide votes to their shareholders at a ratio of one vote per share of common stock. Due to enforcement difficulties, the exchange filed a petition with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (defendant) to change the rule. The SEC did not approve the rule change and instead adopted its own rule. The SEC’s Rule 19c-4 barred a national securities exchange or association, that is, a self-regulating organization (SRO), from listing stock for corporations that took corporate actions to nullify, restrict, or reduce the per share voting rights of stockholders. Under the rule, corporate actions affecting shareholders’ per share voting rights constituted disenfranchisement, even if the actions had been approved by shareholder vote conducted under a one share-one vote procedure. The Business Roundtable (plaintiff) petitioned the D.C. Circuit to review Rule 19c-4, arguing that the SEC exceeded its regulatory authority under the Securities Exchange Act (Exchange Act).

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Williams, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 814,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership