Butler v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
702 F.3d 359 (2012)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Sears, Roebuck and Company (defendant) sold washing machines to two sets of plaintiffs. Each set of plaintiffs filed a products-liability suit against Sears. The first set of plaintiffs alleged that the washing machines caused mold. The second set of plaintiffs alleged that the washing machines suddenly stopped for no reason. Each set of plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification. Whirlpool, the manufacturer of the washing machines, had made certain design changes to the mold-causing machines. Sears argued that these modifications made different models defective in different ways, thus making class certification inappropriate. The district court denied the mold plaintiffs class certification and granted the stoppage plaintiffs class certification. The mold plaintiffs and Sears appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.