Buttram v. United States

Civil Case No. 96-0324-S-BLW (1999)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Buttram v. United States

United States District Court for the District of Idaho
Civil Case No. 96-0324-S-BLW (1999)

Facts

William Buttram and Joshua Oliver were rookie firefighters for the Kuna Rural Fire District (Kuna). On July 28, 1995, a wildland fire emerged on land belonging to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Kuna asked the BLM’s incident commander, David Kerby, if he needed assistance. Kerby stated that he did. Kuna sent two brush trucks, vehicles that work on the front lines of a wildfire, and one water tender, a vehicular water reservoir. Buttram and Oliver took one of the brush trucks, while more experienced firefighters took the other vehicles. Kuna did not inform the BLM that Buttram and Oliver were rookies, and neither Kuna nor the BLM provided Oliver or Buttram, who had never fought a wildland fire, with any training. Prior to the fire, the National Weather Service issued a fire weather watch that warned of thunderstorms and high-speed winds. Approximately an hour after the Kuna vehicles arrived, the National Weather Service contacted the BLM dispatch office over the BLM radio channel to issue a red-flag warning regarding the thunderstorm and potential 50 mile-per-hour winds coming from the south that would push the fire north. Kerby assumed the vehicles also heard the warning over the radio and did not ensure that each vehicle received it. Shortly thereafter, the other brush truck needed to be refilled. Buttram and Oliver’s vehicle followed it but never arrived at the refilling site. Others saw their vehicle driving over a black, burned-out area. A black, burned-out area was considered a safe area incapable of burning a second time unless the wind kicked up dust and ash, hindering visibility. The winds increased notably, and lack of visibility caused Buttram and Oliver to drive past their intended area toward unburned grass and sagebrush on the northern perimeter of the land. The winds then revived the fire and blew it northward. Buttram and Oliver tried unsuccessfully to outrun the fire before being consumed by it. Buttram and Oliver died. Buttram’s and Oliver’s families (plaintiffs) sued the United States (defendant), seeking damages pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Winmill, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership