Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,400+ case briefs...

Bybee v. Hageman

Supreme Court of Illinois
6 Ill. 519 (1873)


John and Elizabeth Ewald executed a mortgage to Hageman (plaintiff) securing the purchase of a parcel of commercial real estate containing a brewery. The Ewalds executed a second mortgage as security under a promissory note to James Manly. Manly assigned the promissory note to Bybee. Hageman filed suit to foreclose the senior mortgage from the Ewalds. Bybee filed a crossclaim to foreclose the junior mortgage issued as security for the promissory note. The trial court ordered judgment of foreclosure in favor of Hageman. Bybee appealed on the theory that the senior mortgage did not constitute a valid lien on the property because the legal description set forth in the senior mortgage was void for uncertainty.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Lawrence, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 490,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 490,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,400 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial