Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,800+ case briefs...

Byford v. Nevada

Supreme Court of Nevada
116 Nev. 215 (2000)


Robert Byford, Christopher Williams, and Todd Smith (defendants) were at Smith’s parents’ home when they received a call from their acquaintance, Monica Wilkins. Byford was 20 years old, Williams was 17, Smith was 19, and Wilkins was 18. Wilkins asked for a ride home from a local casino. Smith and Williams picked up Wilkins and her friend, and Smith asked for gas money. Wilkins asked to stop at a Burger King to get some money. Wilkins and her friend then said that they had obtained another ride home. Smith and Williams were upset, and, after driving off, Williams fired a handgun out of the window of the car. Wilkins had angered the defendants before when she invited them to a party but left with other men. Byford and Williams had talked about getting rid of her. Later the same night, Wilkins called the defendants again, asking for a ride home. Byford, Williams, and Smith picked up Wilkins and drove to the desert where a party was supposed to be taking place. When they arrived, there was no party, but they stopped so everyone could urinate. Then, Byford handed Williams a handgun and said he couldn’t do it. Williams shot Wilkins three to five times in the back. Wilkins got up, and Williams shot her several more times. Wilkins screamed, and Byford took the gun. Byford stated he would make sure the bitch is dead and shot her twice in the head. Byford then poured gasoline on Wilkins and tried to get Smith to light the fire. Smith refused, and Byford lit the body. The defendants were charged with murder. Smith pleaded guilty to accessory to murder and testified against Byford and Williams. The trial court instructed the jury on premeditation and stated that, if premeditation was found, then the killing was willful, deliberate, and premeditated. Byford and Williams were convicted of first-degree murder, and Byford was sentenced to death. Byford appealed.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Shearing, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 499,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 499,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,800 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial