Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Byrne v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

877 So. 2d 462 (2003)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...

Byrne v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Mississippi Court of Appeals

877 So. 2d 462 (2003)

Facts

While in Wal-Mart, Shirley Byrne (plaintiff) slipped on something she thought was a cookie and injured her back and knee. Byrne sued Wal-Mart and two employees (collectively Wal-Mart) (defendants) for negligence on a theory of premises liability. Wal-Mart moved for summary judgment. Byrne did not offer any evidence to show that Wal-Mart committed a negligent act that caused her injury, that Wal-Mart knew that the object was on the floor, or that the object was on the floor long enough for Wal-Mart to notice and remove it. Byrne did not know how long the object had been on the floor. There was evidence that Wal-Mart employees conducted safety sweeps and clean-ups. The trial court granted Wal-Mart’s motion for summary judgment. On appeal, Byrne argued that the trial court should have applied the “mode of operation” theory to her case.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Myers, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 602,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership