Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

C.B.C. Distribution and Marketing, Inc. v. Major League Baseball Advanced Media, L.P.

United States Court of Appeals for Eighth Circuit
505 F.3d 818 (2007)


Facts

C.B.C. Distribution and Marketing, Inc. (C.B.C.) (plaintiff) sold fantasy sports products to consumers on the Internet, via e-mail, mail, and telephone which incorporated statistical and biographical information of actual major league baseball players. Prior to the start of a particular baseball season, customers would “draft” players from the various teams and compete against other players. Between 1995 and 2004, the Major League Baseball Players Association (MLBPA) granted C.B.C. a license to use the “names, nicknames, likenesses, signatures, pictures, playing records, and/or biographical data of each player.” After their agreement expired, the MLBPA licensed the exclusive right, with some exceptions, to use players’ names and performance information to Major League Baseball Advanced Media, L.P. (Advanced Media) (defendant). Advanced Media then provided fantasy baseball games on its website, MLB.com. C.B.C. brought suit against Advanced Media seeking declaratory relief that it had the right to use, without license, the names and information of major league baseball players. Advanced Media counter-claimed, alleging C.B.C.’s fantasy products violated the players’ rights of publicity that it had been licensed by the MLBPA. The MLBPA joined the suit and raised breach of contract claims against C.B.C. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of C.B.C., and Advanced Media and the MBLPA appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Arnold, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Colloton, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 170,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.