C.B.C. Distribution and Marketing, Inc. v. Major League Baseball Advanced Media, L.P.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
443 F. Supp. 2d 1077, Case No. 4:05CV00252MLM (2006)
- Written by Steven Pacht, JD
Facts
C.B.C. Distribution and Marketing, Inc. (CBC) (plaintiff) provided interactive fantasy baseball games via its website. Participants competed against each other based on the real-world performances of Major League Baseball (MLB) players (players). CBC’s website provided participants with the players’ publicly available performance records. In 2002, CBC entered into a license agreement (license) with the MLB Players Association (PA) (defendant) pursuant to which CBC obtained the right to use MLB player names and playing records. The license further provided that CBC would cease using such information upon the agreement’s 2004 expiration and that CBC would not challenge the license’s validity. In early 2005, MLB Advanced Media, L.P. (Advanced) (defendant), MLB’s internet arm, made it clear that CBC could not obtain a new license to MLB player names and records. CBC sued Advanced, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. The PA intervened and brought a counterclaim, alleging that CBC violated the players’ rights of publicity by using their names and performance records in CBC’s games. The parties each moved for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Medler, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.