C & J Energy Services, Inc. v. City of Miami General Employees’ Retirement Trust
Delaware Supreme Court
107 A.3d 1049 (2014)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
C & J Energy Services, Inc. (defendant) agreed to merge with a subsidiary of Nabors Industries Ltd. Under the agreement, Nabors, a Bermudian entity, would maintain a controlling interest in the new entity, which would be domiciled in Bermuda. The transaction would benefit C & J stockholders in the form of tax benefits worth $200 million in net present value. Those tax benefits could not be realized if Nabors did not maintain its controlling interest. To offset their decreased control, the transaction guaranteed C & J stockholders a pro rata share of any future sale of the new entity. Finally, the agreement enabled C & J to rescind the deal if a better offer emerged. The City of Miami General Employees’ Retirement Trust (plaintiff), a C & J stockholder, brought suit challenging the transaction. The Chancery Court of Delaware issued a preliminary injunction enjoining a stockholder vote on the merger, pending the C & J board shopping the company. The court ruled there was a plausible showing that the C & J board violated its duties under Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., 506 A.2d 173 (Del. 1986), by neglecting to actively shop the company before agreeing to the transaction. C & J appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Strine, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 966,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.


