C-lec Plastics v. Commissioner

76 T.C. 601 (1981)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

C-lec Plastics v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
76 T.C. 601 (1981)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

Edward D. Walsh was the president and sole shareholder of C-lec Plastics (C-lec) (plaintiff). Sometime before May 31, 1970, C-lec created plastic molds to be used by Physics International. C-lec deducted the cost of making the molds on its income-tax return. In 1972 C-lec abandoned the molds, and Walsh took possession of them. Walsh’s tax basis in the molds was zero. In 1973 C-lec owed almost $54,000 to Walsh. C-lec decided to retake possession of the molds. C-lec issued a credit to Walsh worth $37,000. C-lec gave Walsh 500 shares of stock worth $80 each, for a total value of $40,000. In addition, C-lec reduced its debt to Walsh by almost $3,000. In December 1973, the molds were destroyed in a fire. C-lec attempted to take a casualty-loss deduction on the molds, arguing that its basis in the molds was $37,000. C-lec argued that it issued a credit to Walsh for $40,000 for the molds and that this debt was unrelated to the stock issuance or debt reduction. The Commissioner determined that C-lec was not entitled to a casualty loss because its basis in the molds was zero. C-lec appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Drennen, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership