C. R. & S. R. v. E.

573 So. 2d 1088 (1991)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

C. R. & S. R. v. E.

Florida District Court of Appeal
573 So. 2d 1088 (1991)

  • Written by Noah Lewis, JD

Facts

E. (plaintiff), a Catholic priest, molested a girl. The girl’s parents, C. R. & S. R. (defendants), agreed to resolve the matter through a mediation and arbitration forum offered by Christian Conciliation Service of Central Florida, Inc. (CCS). The CCS rules provide for confidentiality. The mediation failed. The parties submitted to binding arbitration, which resulted in findings of fact and law that the priest had inappropriately touched the girl on several occasions and that the Catholic church was negligent in retaining and supervising the priest. The arbitration panel found that the priest and the church were jointly and severally liable for $250,000, which was paid by the local diocese to the parents. Twenty months later, counsel for the parents informed church counsel that the parents considered any confidentiality agreement to be null and void. The parents sought to meet with the bishop and parish counsel in the priest’s new assignment to discuss the priest’s history of molestation and a possible public apology. The priest filed a petition for a temporary and permanent injunction prohibiting the parents from disclosing the information. The trial court issued an injunction prohibiting the parents from talking to the media or other third parties about the facts and findings of the CCS arbitration. The trial court denied the parents’ motion to dissolve the temporary injunction. The parents appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

Dissent (Cobb, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership