Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

C. Van Der Lely N.V. v. F. Lli Maschio, S.n.c.

36 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1489, 221 U.S.P.Q. 34 (1983)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...

C. Van Der Lely N.V. v. F. Lli Maschio, S.n.c.

United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio

36 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1489, 221 U.S.P.Q. 34 (1983)

Facts

C. Van Der Lely N.V. (Lely) (plaintiff) filed a patent-infringement lawsuit in federal court against F. Lli Maschio, S.n.c. (Maschio) (defendant). Maschio’s initial answer raised a defense of invalidity based on anticipation. However, Maschio’s later responses to interrogatories stated that Maschio would not pursue an anticipation defense. Prior to trial, Lely and Maschio agreed to a comprehensive final pretrial order that omitted anticipation and only indicated Maschio intended to argue invalidity for obviousness. A patent found invalid for anticipation would be inherently invalid for obviousness.Maschio omitted the issue of anticipation in its first and second amended answers and never moved to modify the final pretrial order. At trial, Maschio asserted in its opening statement that at least one of Lely’s patent claims was invalid for anticipation. Lely objected to Maschio’s assertion of an anticipation defense. Maschio did not explain why it failed to raise anticipation until its opening statement. The district court instructed each party to submit a brief arguing its position on whether the court should modify the final pretrial order to allow Maschio to raise the defense of anticipation.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Holschuh, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 604,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 604,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 604,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,800 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership