Cain Partnership, Ltd. v. Pioneer Investment Services Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
914 S.W.2d 452 (1996)
In 1974, Cain Partnership, Ltd. (Cain) (plaintiff) leased a tract of property to Pioneer Investment Services Co. (Pioneer) (defendant). The lease required Pioneer to pay rent and any property taxes. Except for a provision allowing Cain to recover attorney’s fees if Cain had to sue to enforce the lease, the lease did not contain any language regarding default in payment or performance, forfeiture, or remedies for breach. When Pioneer failed to pay property taxes, Cain sued to terminate the lease and recover the premises. The trial court found that the lease had no provision for termination, and therefore, the lease could not be judicially terminated. Accordingly, the trial court dismissed the case. The Tennessee Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s decision. Cain appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Reid, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 178,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.