Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Cairo, Inc. v. Crossmedia Services, Inc.

2005 WL 756610 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 1, 2005)

Case BriefQ&ARelatedOptions
From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...

Cairo, Inc. v. Crossmedia Services, Inc.

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

2005 WL 756610 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 1, 2005)

Play video

Facts

Crossmedia Services, Inc. (CMS) (defendant) operated a website displaying advertisements and available merchandise at local brick-and-mortar stores. Webpages on CMS’s website contained a notice stating that by continuing to the use the website, users agreed to CMS’s terms of use. The notice contained a link through which users could access the full terms of use. The terms of use contained a forum selection clause stating that any disputes arising from the terms of use would be adjudicated in state or federal court in Chicago. Cairo, Inc. (Cairo) (plaintiff) operated a similar website. Cairo compiled promotional materials from retailers and third parties, including CMS. Cairo collected the information via “robots” or “crawlers” that visited websites and recorded the data therein. Cairo’s website contained thumbnail images of information from CMS’s website. Cairo users could click on the thumbnail to go directly to CMS’s website. CMS sent a cease-and-desist letter to Cairo. Cairo brought suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, seeking a declaratory judgment that it did not infringe CMS’s intellectual property rights. CMS filed a motion to dismiss for improper venue because, pursuant to the forum selection clause in the terms of use, Cairo should have filed its lawsuit in a state or federal court in Chicago. Cairo argued that there was no contract formed between the parties that would render CMS’s terms of use binding on Cairo. Cairo acknowledged that it was aware of the terms of use as of the day before it received the cease-and-desist letter.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ware, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 517,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 517,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions and answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 517,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 22,300 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership