Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Califano v. Torres

435 U.S. 1 (1978)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...

Califano v. Torres

United States Supreme Court

435 U.S. 1 (1978)

Facts

A 1972 amendment to the Social Security Act created the Supplemental Social Security Income (SSI) program. The program was created to support the elderly, the blind, and people with disabilities. Recipients had to be residents of the United States, which the act defined as those living in any of the 50 states or Washington, D.C. This definition meant that residents of Puerto Rico were excluded from receiving SSI benefits. The act also provided that there was no eligibility for benefits for months spent outside the United States. This geographic restriction meant that persons who received SSI while living in the United States lost those benefits upon moving to Puerto Rico. For example, Cesar Gautier Torres (defendant) lost the SSI benefits he had received while living in Connecticut. Likewise, Carmelo Bracero Colon (defendant) lost the benefits received while residing in Massachusetts, and Vega (defendant) lost the benefits received while living in New Jersey. These former recipients whose benefits were discontinued upon moving to Puerto Rico filed suits in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. In these cases, the district court viewed the act’s geographic restriction as a burden on the constitutional right of United States residents to travel and enjoined the denial of SSI benefits on the basis of a recipient’s relocation to Puerto Rico. Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare Joseph Califano (plaintiff) appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 605,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 605,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 605,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,800 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership