California Brewers Association v. Bryant

444 U.S. 598 (1980)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

California Brewers Association v. Bryant

United States Supreme Court
444 U.S. 598 (1980)

Facts

Beginning in May 1968, Bryant (plaintiff), who was Black, worked intermittently as a temporary employee of the Falstaff Brewing Corporation (defendant). A collective-bargaining agreement (the CBA) governed employment relations between seven breweries and certain unions on behalf of brewing-industry employees including Bryant. Under the CBA, a permanent employee was anyone who had worked at least 45 weeks in the preceding calendar year. A temporary employee was anyone who had worked at least 60 days in the preceding year. Permanent employees had substantially more favorable rights in terms of hiring and layoffs. Bryant sued seven brewing companies and several unions (the brewing entities) (defendants) under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII). The complaint alleged that historical discrimination against Black people was being perpetuated by the CBA because attaining permanent status under the 45-week rule was highly improbable. The district court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim. The court of appeals reversed, holding that the 45-week scheme was not a seniority system that would exempt the brewing entities from Title VII liability. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)

Dissent (Marshall, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 826,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 826,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 991 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 826,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 991 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership