Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

California Coastal Commission v. Granite Rock Co.

United States Supreme Court
480 U.S. 572 (1987)


Facts

Granite Rock Company (Granite) (plaintiff) held unpatented mining claims in a national forest. The United States Forest Service (USFS) approved Granite’s mining plan, and Granite began mining operations. Under California law, a company mining in California’s coastal zone was required to obtain a permit from the California Coastal Commission (Commission) (defendant). The Commission told Granite to apply for this permit. Granite filed suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, seeking to enjoin the Commission from requiring the permit. Granite argued that the California law was preempted by USFS regulations and federal land-use statutes and regulations, including the Federal Land Policy and Management Act and the National Forest Management Act (Acts) and all ensuing regulations. The USFS regulations had been implemented in part to ensure that unpatented mining operations were conducted with limited environmental impact. However, the USFS regulations acknowledged the existence of state laws and stated that certification by state agencies of compliance with similar state mining laws and regulations would “be accepted as compliance” with the USFS regulations. The Commission argued that it would not prohibit Granite’s mining, but merely sought to regulate the mining. Granite filed a motion for summary judgment. The district court denied Granite’s motion and dismissed the claim. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed, finding that California’s permit requirement was federally preempted. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.