California Oregon Power Co. v. Beaver Portland Cement Co.

295 U.S. 142 (1935)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

California Oregon Power Co. v. Beaver Portland Cement Co.

United States Supreme Court
295 U.S. 142 (1935)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

In 1885, the federal government granted a Homestead Act patent to land bordered by an unnavigable river to the predecessor of the California Oregon Power Company (the power company) (plaintiff). Neither the power company nor its predecessor ever diverted or appropriated water from the river. When the Beaver Portland Cement Company (the cement company) (defendant) contracted to buy land with adjudicated, permitted water rights on the opposite bank and began blasting to open the channel and build a dam, the power company sued to enjoin any interference that would decrease the flow. The power company claimed common-law riparian rights attached to the land when the government originally issued the patent. The district court found the patent carried with it common-law rights to have the flow continue in its natural channel without substantial diminution but also found the state could modify that right under its police power and denied an injunction except for preventing the cement company from lowering the water below a fixed level. The power company appealed. After the Ninth Circuit affirmed, the Supreme Court granted review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sutherland, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership