California Public Utilities Commission
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
132 FERC ¶ 61,047 (2010)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) (plaintiff) implemented a regulation requiring California utilities to offer a set price to certain small, combined-heat-and-power (CHP) generators. California Assembly Bill (AB) 1613 required utilities to offer to purchase electricity generated by certain CHP generators at a price set by the CPUC. These set prices were called feed-in tariffs. The CPUC exercised its jurisdiction under AB 1613 to require the purchase of electricity at a set price by utilities from highly efficient CHP generators for the purpose of reducing emissions. The CPUC filed a petition seeking a declaratory order from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), finding that the CPUC’s feed-in tariffs for CHP generators were not preempted by §§ 205 and 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), § 210 of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA), and FERC regulations. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Southern California Edison Company, and San Diego Gas & Electric Company filed a separate petition seeking a declaratory order that CPUC’s set rates are preempted by the FPA.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.