California Public Utilities Commission

132 FERC ¶ 61,047 (2010)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

California Public Utilities Commission

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
132 FERC ¶ 61,047 (2010)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) (plaintiff) implemented a regulation requiring California utilities to offer a set price to certain small, combined-heat-and-power (CHP) generators. California Assembly Bill (AB) 1613 required utilities to offer to purchase electricity generated by certain CHP generators at a price set by the CPUC. These set prices were called feed-in tariffs. The CPUC exercised its jurisdiction under AB 1613 to require the purchase of electricity at a set price by utilities from highly efficient CHP generators for the purpose of reducing emissions. The CPUC filed a petition seeking a declaratory order from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), finding that the CPUC’s feed-in tariffs for CHP generators were not preempted by §§ 205 and 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), § 210 of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA), and FERC regulations. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Southern California Edison Company, and San Diego Gas & Electric Company filed a separate petition seeking a declaratory order that CPUC’s set rates are preempted by the FPA.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership